The German-made Leopard 2 is more advanced than the Soviet-era tanks that Ukraine has relied on in battle so far. Leopard tanks have been used by the German Army for decades and by the militaries Not only is the neck of the Abrams a random black hole after it's buffs, it's also got BY FAR the highest survivability compared to anything Russian and still slightly better than any Leopard 2, this is thanks to: Better crew placement than the Leo 2. More crew than anything Russian. No hull ammo unlike both Leo 2 and anything Russian. He added: "There is a belief that Challenger 2 is better protected than either Leopard 2 or M1 Abrams. "However, modern ATGMs are lethal. So Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams are fitted with an active The article argues that its engine is more powerful than an Abrams tank due to its having a better thrust-to-weight ratio, meaning that a 1,500-horsepower Armata engine drives a 55-ton tank Both the M1 Abrams and Leopard 2 have undergone battle-testing and proven their effectiveness in various conflicts. While the M1 Abrams boasts heavier armament and armor, the Leopard 2's mobility and customization options make it better suited for different mission types Overall, it's safe to say the Leopard 2 is a true standout, offering All in the Ariete is a rather light MBT at just 60 tons. This is significantly less than the Leopard 2, Challenger 2 and Abrams, all of which surpass 70 tons depending on the variant and add ons fitted. Its engine is able to power it up to a speed of over 40 mph (65 km/h). WllF.

is the leopard 2 better than the abrams